This is the Site of #VoteTrump2016 in #Chicago #Illinois

Wednesday, March 30, 2016

#Obama Gives $270K Grant #ISIS #MUSLIM ‘Charity’ ! #TrumpTrain #VoteTrump #VoteTrump #ISIA

ByPAMELA GELLER on March 30, 2016

3 Comments
egyptobamasupportsterrorism
This is consistent with Obama’s years-long pro-jihad policy both here and abroad. This is a pattern.
Despite a “mountain of evidence,” Obama’s DoJ scuttled the prosecutions of scores of terror-tied Islamic groups named in the largest terrorist funding trial in our nation’s history — including CAIR, ISNA, MSA et al.
The idea that Obama and his party are funding our executioners with our own hard-earned taxpayer dollars is just further proof of the treason and anti-Americanism endemic to the left.
“Feds Give $270K Grant To Islamic Charity With Alleged Ties To Hamas, Muslim Brotherhood,” By Chuck Ross, Daily Caller, March 30, 2016:
The Obama administration recently gave a $270,000 grant to an Islamic charity that has been banned by Israel and the United Arab Emirates because of alleged financial ties to the terrorist group Hamas and to the Muslim Brotherhood.
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services provided the funds last month to the U.K.-based Islamic Relief Worldwide (IRW) for its work in Kenya, according to the federal spending database USASpending.gov.
obama-muslim-brotherhood
The funds are earmarked for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s global health security partner engagement initiative.
The program is aimed at fighting infectious diseases and promoting “global health security as an international priority,” according to the CDC website.
But IRW has been at the center of other security concerns.
In 2014, Israel and United Arab Emirates banned IRW, which is headquartered in Birmingham, England, from operating within its borders alleging that the group supports and funds Hamas, the Muslim Brotherhood’s military arm in Palestine.
Special: Princess Kate Middleton Leaves Royal Family, Starts Skincare Line
Israeli defense minister Moshe Yaalon alleged in July 2014 that IRW’s chapters in the West Bank and Gaza Strip were being run by members of Hamas.
“The IRW is one of the sources of Hamas’s funding and a means for raising funds from various countries in the world,” Israeli defense minister Moshe Yaalon said in a July 2014 statement. “We do not intend to allow it to function and abet terrorist activity against Israel.”
In 2006, the Israeli Security Agency arrested Iyaz Ali, a Pakistani-born British national who worked as project director of IRW’s operations in the West Bank.
“He worked to transfer funds and assistance to various Hamas institutions and organizations, including the Al Wafa and Al Tzalah associations, which have been outlawed in Israel,” reads a 2006 statement from Israel’s defense ministry. Ali also admitted that he had worked and cooperated with Hamas operatives in Jordan.
“The IRW provides support and assistance to Hamas’s infrastructure,” the statement continued, alleging that IRW’s operations are “controlled and staffed by Hamas operatives.”
“The intensive activities of these associations are designed to further Hamas’s ideology among the Palestinian population.”
In Nov. 2014, United Arab Emirates added IRW to its list of designated terrorist organizations. HSBC, the London-based bank, also severed its relationship with IRW, citing the alleged terror ties.
IRW has strongly denied any associations with Hamas or terrorist activities. The Obama administration has favorably cited the group’s work on international relief issues. IRW is also allied with numerous other foreign governments and large philanthropies.
But Ryan Mauro, who tracks terror-linked group as a national security analyst for the Clarion Project, says that IRW’s links to Hamas and Muslim Brotherhood should, at the very least, disqualify it from receiving any federal funding.
“IRW’s Muslim Brotherhood ties should rule it out of the running for government grants. This is simply common sense,” Mauro told The Daily Caller.
The CDC grant isn’t the first federal grant IRW has received this year. As the Washington Free Beacon reported in December, U.S. Agency for International Development gave IRW a $100,000 stipend, also for work in Kenya.
Mauro also noted that more than 50 members of Congress support new legislation labeling the Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist group. One supporter of the measure if Texas Sen. Ted Cruz.
“Don’t taxpayers deserve to have their money go to a humanitarian group without such risks?” Mauro wondered. “If you want to give it to a Muslim group, then give it to one without an Islamist history so we can build up better alternatives.”
- See more at: http://pamelageller.com/2016/03/obama-admin-funds-jihad-terror.html/#sthash.6RSFdcy1.dpuf

Tuesday, March 29, 2016

WETBACKS Burn Effigy And Shout “Death To #Trump” #TrumpTrain #VoteTrump #ISIS #TERROR

 Because He Actually Supports American Law And Does Not Kowtow To The Whims Of Foreigners

Trump4-655952
Burning people in effigy is an old way of protesting, but really, if these people were looking to make a more effective point, they only one they made was that Donald’s proposed wall should be even bigger and badder than what it already is. That and they have solidified in the minds of many people, including some who may have even sympathized with them, that a wall is needed and the sooner it is built the better.
Since this took place during Holy Week, this is actually an insult to a very Catholic tradition, which is the burning of an effigy of Judas Iscariot. Trump has thus far shown himself to be anything but is anything but Judas. But after all, I can understand they may be a little confused- Judas is a man, when in reality they needed a woman this year for the real effigy:
But as far as I am convinced, they can waste their time, talents, and effort burning Donald Trump in effigy all they want- on their side of the wall, that is.
DonaldTrump1
Via the UK Express:
Hundreds of residents of La Merced, a poor neighbourhood in Mexico City, cheered and yelled “death” during their Easter rituals on Saturday as flames licked around the papier mâché model of the Republican candidate. 
The mock-up of the controversial real estate tycoon was dressed in a blue blazer and red tie and featured his trademark tuft of blond hair.
Mexican media reported that similar scenes were played out across the country, from Puebla to the industrial hub Monterrey.
The burning is part of a Mexican Holy Week tradition where neighbourhoods burn effigies representing Judas Iscariot who betrayed Jesus. 
TRUMP 2016. 

CHRISTIANS ARE BEING KILLED AND RAPED EVERY SINGLE DAY, PLEASE CLICK HERE TO MAKE A DONATION TO OUR RESCUE TEAM THAT WILL SAVE THE LIVES OF CHRISTIANS FROM PERSECUTION

PERSECUTION IS COMING, AND EVENTUALLY SHOEBAT.COM IS GOING TO BE PULLED OUT OF FACEBOOK. PRETTY SOON THE BEST WAY TO REACH US WILL BE THROUGH OUR NEWSLETTER. CLICK HERE TO JOIN OUR NEWSLETTER, AND CONTINUE EDUCATING YOURSELF ON WHAT THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA WON’T REPORT


Friday, March 25, 2016

NO MORE SYRIAN REFUGEES !!! #Obama #Clinton #Hillary #Trump #TrumpTrain

#Trump A Picture is worth a THOUSAND WORDS ! #TrumpTrain #VoteTrump

#MUSLIM prof: When Quran says “kill them,” it doesn’t mean it ! #Trump #TrumpTrain @JihadwatchRS


Joseph Lumbard is “Assistant Professor of Arabic and Translation Studies, American University of Sharjah” in the UAE; apparently he has left Brandeis, where he was in 2014 when he promised to “dominate” me in debate, and then ran away. A convert to Islam, he is an editor of the cynical and deceptive new Study Quranthat has been hailed as the true “moderate” version of the Muslim book.
This piece is just as cynical and deceptive. He spends many windy paragraphs explaining that the Qur’an has context that jihadis ignore, and then proceeds to ignore it himself. In attempting to explain away Qur’an 9:5, “slay the idolaters wherever you find them,” he makes no mention what classic and mainstream Qur’an commentators say about the verse: Ibn Juzayy notes that v. 5 abrogates “every peace treaty in the Qur’an,” and specifically abrogates the Qur’an’s directive to “set free or ransom” captive unbelievers (47:4). According to As-Suyuti, “This is an Ayat of the Sword which abrogates pardon, truce and overlooking” — that is, perhaps the overlooking of the pagans’ offenses. The Tafsir al-Jalalayn says that the Muslims must “slay the idolaters wherever you find them, be it during a lawful [period] or a sacred [one], and take them, captive, and confine them, to castles and forts, until they have no choice except death or Islam.”
Ibn Kathir echoes this, directing that Muslims should “not wait until you find them. Rather, seek and besiege them in their areas and forts, gather intelligence about them in the various roads and fairways so that what is made wide looks ever smaller to them. This way, they will have no choice, but to die or embrace Islam.” He also doesn’t seem to subscribe to the view commonly put forward by Muslim spokesmen in the West today — that this verse applies only to the pagans of Arabia in Muhammad’s time, and has no further application. He asserts, on the contrary, that “slay the unbelievers wherever you find them” means just that: the unbelievers must be killed “on the earth in general, except for the Sacred Area” — that is, the sacred mosque in Mecca, in accord with Qur’an 2:191.
If the unbelievers convert to Islam, the Muslims must stop killing them. The Tafsir al-Jalalayn: “But if they repent, of unbelief, and establish prayer and pay the alms, then leave their way free, and do not interfere with them.” Ibn Kathir: “These Ayat [verses] allowed fighting people unless, and until, they embrace Islam and implement its rulings and obligations.” Qutb says that the termination of the treaties with a four-month grace period, combined with the call to kill the unbelievers, “was not meant as a campaign of vengeance or extermination, but rather as a warning which provided a motive for them to accept Islam.”
Finally, it is noteworthy that, according to As-Suyuti, the jurist Ash-Shafi’i took this as a proof for killing anyone who abandons the prayer and fighting anyone who refuses to pay zakat [alms]. “Some use it as a proof that they are kafirun [unbelievers].” Likewise Ibn Kathir: “Abu Bakr As-Siddiq used this and other honorable Ayat as proof for fighting those who refrained from paying the Zakah.” Thus even Muslims who do not fulfill Islamic obligations fall into the category of those who must be fought. This is a principle that latter-day Salafist movements apply broadly and use frequently in branding governments that do not rule according to strict Islamic law as unbelievers who must be fought by those who regard themselves as true Muslims. This is playing out now in the Islamic State’s declaration that those Muslims who do not accept its authority are unbelievers and can therefore lawfully be killed.
Joseph Lumbard
“Understanding the Relationship Between the Quran and Extremism,” by Joseph E. B. Lumbard, Huffington Post, March 23, 2016:
…Muslim scholars have always been aware that texts have historical contexts and must be understood in accordance with them. One of the central tools for Quranic interpretation is the “occasions of revelation.” These reports outline the particular historical circumstances in which passages of the Quran were first articulated. They are essential for interpretation and are employed in all major Quran commentaries. In one instance, Ali ibn Abi Talib told a man that if he did not know the “occasions of revelation,” or historical contexts, he should not comment on the Quran.
The “occasions of revelation” guide interpreters in determining which verses have broad application and which are more limited in scope. They restrict the application of several Quranic verses to particular historical circumstances. The most famous instance of such contextual limitation is perhaps Quran 9:5, known as “The Sword Verse”:
Then, when the sacred months have passed, slay the idolaters wheresoever you find them, capture them, besiege them, and lie in wait for them at every place of ambush. But if they repent, and perform the prayer and give the alms, then let them go their way.
The majority of Muslim scholars maintain that the phrase “slay the idolaters wheresoever you find them” refers to particular tribes that had declared open warfare on the Muslims during the lifetime of the Prophet Muhammad. Awareness of this historical circumstance contains and restrains the interpretation of the verse, thus preventing the wanton and unwarranted applications that those with political ambitions and apocalyptic visions seek today. As Qadi Abu Bakr, one of the most influential commentators in Islamic history writes, “It is clear that the intended meaning of the verse is to slay those idolaters who are waging war against you.” Heeding the call to fight issued in Quran 9:5 is thus conditional upon there being an existing state of aggression. If, however, one casts aside historical context and interpretive tradition, passages such as 9:5 are employed by strident ideologues to advocate a state of perpetual warfare….
CNN guest says "white people" don't understand Islamic culture -- Ibrahim Hooper hardest hit
Facebook

Thursday, March 24, 2016

#Illinois Hispanic Leader Endorses #TRUMP #TrumpTrain #VoteTrump


Devout #MUSLIM #Brussels Killers Planned to Hit Nuke Site #ISIS #ISLAM #TERROR #OBAMA @Atlas

ByPAMELA GELLER on March 24, 2016

00 Comments
tihange
I reported here at Atlas two days ago that Belgian nuclear plants had been evacuated after the Brussels jihad massacre. Now we learn that “an earlier February raid on the Brussels home of arrested terror suspect Mohamed Bakkali’s wife turned up over 10 hours of video showing the Flanders home of the Research and Development director of the Belgian Nuclear Program.” These savages want to murder on a massive scale.
Khalid El Bakraoui, Ibrahim El Bakraoui and Najim Laachraoui


“Brussels bombers may have planned to hit nuke site,” Times of Israel, March 24, 2016 (thanks to Christian):
The terror cell that bombed Brussels airport and the city’s subway may have planned to target one of Belgium’s nuclear sites and had gathered surveillance footage of the home of a senior nuclear director which was filmed by the El Bakraoui brothers — identified as two of the suicide bombers behind the deadly attacks earlier this week.
An earlier February raid on the Brussels home of arrested terror suspect Mohamed Bakkali’s wife turned up over 10 hours of video showing the Flanders home of the Research and Development director of the Belgian Nuclear Program, the daily Derniere Heure reported Thursday.
The footage was filmed on a camera hidden in bushes opposite the home, and was recovered by two men who drove off in a car without the lights on.
Those men have been identified as Khalid and Ibrahim El Bakraoui who took part in the Tuesday attacks on the airport and the Maalbeek metro station, which killed 31 people and injured over 150 others, the report said.
Their names were not published at the time due to the ongoing investigation.
After investigators examining the footage last month made the connection between the subject of the video and the nuclear program, security was beefed up at French and Belgian nuclear sites with army units being drafted in to provide additional protection.
Ibrahim El Bakraoui was identified as one of at least two suicide bombers who targeted the Brussels airport. Authorities Thursday stepped up the manhunt for a third airport attacker, seen wearing a hat and white jacket on CCTV footage from Zaventem departure hall, whose explosive-packed suitcase failed to go off with the two other suicide bombers.
Khalid El Bakraoui blew himself up at the Maalbeek subway station killing 20 people. Local media, citing unnamed sources, said a second suspect was filmed by surveillance cameras in the metro station carrying a large bag alongside Bakraoui.
Bakkali, who had rented the Brussels apartment where the video footage was found, is being held on suspicion of terrorist activity and involvement in the November 13 2015 Paris terror attacks that killed 130 people.
The three identified suspects behind the twin assaults in Brussels have also been linked to the Paris attacks last November.
- See more at: http://pamelageller.com/2016/03/devout-muslim-brussels-killers-may-have-planned-to-hit-nuke-site.html/#sthash.pz9vwgXb.dpuf

Wednesday, March 23, 2016

After #Brussels Attacks, Jeff Sessions Says Radical #Islam ‘Cannot Be Ignored’ ! #MUSLIM #OBAMA #TERROR @Breitbart

2

Republican 
Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL)
80%
 is warning that radical Islam is a threat that “cannot be ignored,” following the shocking Islamic attacks that killed dozens of people in Brussels, Belgium.

Jeff Sessions, who chairs the Senate’s subcommittee on strategic forces and the subcommittee on immigration and the national interest, released a statement saying the attacks “confirmed the reality” that radical Islam is one of the world’s leading dangers.
“The entire world extends its sympathy to the people of Brussels who have suffered such terrible loss,” Sessions wrote. “Today’s attacks confirm the reality of the threat the Western world faces from radical Islam. It cannot be ignored. This threat must be confronted with clarity and resolve,” the Alabama Senator insisted.
Sessions pointed to the Muslim refugee crisis swamping Europe and threatening to hit the United States, thanks to the policies President Barack Obama wants to put in place.
“Clearly, the refugee and migration policies of Europe and the United States must be thoughtfully reconsidered,” Sessions wrote. “The United States Refugee Admissions Program must be significantly altered and all its components closely examined.”
Sessions went on to point out that allowing Muslims into the country indiscriminately is a recipe for disaster.
“It cannot be the policy of the United States that millions of foreign nationals are able to demand permanent entry into this country as refugees or asylees, particularly when our law enforcement and intelligence communities cannot adequately screen these individuals for security risks,” the Senator said.
“There must be limits,” Sessions added. “We know many terrorists have used and will use this process, and every other available method, to gain entry into our country. Indeed, at least 14 individuals admitted to the United States as refugees have been implicated in terrorism in the last year alone.”
Acknowledging people around the world have “desperate needs,” Sessions warned that “many bad actors seek to exploit human tragedy” by using the refugee crisis to bring terror to innocents around the world.
“Our primary goal must be to protect the American people,” Sessions said. He went on to suggest a solution to the problem.
But we should use all reasonable efforts to help those in crisis by creating safe zones and providing aid close to their homes. This will allow those displaced to return home when the violence abates. The Europeans have requested the establishment of safe zones, but the United States continues to “study” the situation and has not taken sufficient action. This stalling must end. And countries throughout the region that have done little to accept those who have been displaced must do more.
The sad truth is that the extreme and misguided refugee and immigration policies of Europe provide us with valuable insight. Europe has admitted migrants from areas with histories of terrorism in such large numbers that assimilation has failed. This has allowed radicalization to occur. The Brussels attacks underscore the risks that these failed policies have created.
Assuring the nation that the U.S. always reaches out to help those in need, Sessions said the “huge cost” and the “people’s safety” needs to be considered in government policy.
“Unless we change, the danger to the people of the United States will surely get worse,” Sessions wrote.
“Defeating this generational threat is the challenge of our time. It will not be easy or quick. Defeat of Al Qaeda or ISIS will not be the end. Experts tell us that this dangerous radicalization may last for decades. A strategy that is strong, relentless and realistic must be developed that can gain bipartisan support along with the support of our allies, within and without the region,” the Senator said.
“This is essential and doable,” Sessions concluded. “With such a well-considered strategy, we can defeat terrorism and further peace in the Middle East, Europe and the United States.”
Follow Warner Todd Huston on Twitter @warnerthuston, or email the author at igcolonel@hotmail.com.

Tuesday, March 22, 2016

#Trump: Brussels an “armed camp,” today’s jihad attacks “just the beginning” #ISIS #OBAMA #TERROR #ISLAM #MUSLIM

  BY 

“I will tell you, I’ve been talking about this a long time, and look at Brussels. Brussels was a beautiful city, a beautiful place with zero crime. And now it’s a disaster city. It’s a total disaster, and we have to be very careful in the United States, we have to be very careful and very vigilant as to who we allow in this country.” He is right about this — whatever else he is wrong about. This is why his campaign is resonating with so many people.
Donald Trump
“Donald Trump: Brussels ‘just the beginning,'” by David Wright, CNN, March 22, 2016:
(CNN)Donald Trump reacted to the explosions that rocked Brussels Tuesday morning, describing the scene as a “disaster” and warning that “this is just the beginning.”
The Republican front-runner, who has made immigration and security issues central to his 2016 presidential bid, discussed the reported suicide attacks in an interview on Fox News’ “Fox and Friends.”
“I will tell you, I’ve been talking about this a long time, and look at Brussels,” Trump said. “Brussels was a beautiful city, a beautiful place with zero crime. And now it’s a disaster city. It’s a total disaster, and we have to be very careful in the United States, we have to be very careful and very vigilant as to who we allow in this country. ”
Trump ‘fine’ with waterboarding
In an another interview, Trump also said he would be “fine” with waterboarding Salah Abdeslam, one of the leaders of the Paris attacks several months ago who was just captured in Brussels, in order to get more information on potential future attacks.
“Well I’m not looking to break any news on your show, but frankly the waterboarding, if it was up to me, and if we changed the laws or have the laws, waterboarding would be fine,” the Republican front-runner said on NBC’s “Today” show. “I would say they should be able to do whatever they have to do.”
“You know, we work within laws. They don’t work within laws — they have no laws. We work within laws. The waterboarding would be fine, and if they could expand the laws, I would do a lot more than waterboarding,” he said.
Trump has vacillated in his campaign about whether or not he would pursue using waterboarding — which is considered torture and thus illegal. After getting criticized by former national security officials, Trump said he would instead seek to expand the laws, presumably to make such tactics legal.
‘Armed camp’
On Fox, he described Brussels now as an “armed camp.”
“If you went into Brussels 20 years ago, it was like a magical city. Now you look at it, it’s an armed camp,” Trump said. “You want to lead your life, you don’t want to be living in an armed camp for your whole life. And there is a certain group of people that is making living a normal life impossible.”
Though the identity of any suspects related to the explosions is not yet known, Trump was quick to link the attacks to Muslim refugees and migrants from the Middle East who have flooded into Europe as a result of Syria’s civil war and turmoil in the region.
“It’s going to get worse and worse. In my opinion, this is just the beginning. It will get worse and worse because we are lax and we are foolish — we can’t allow these people, at this point we cannot allow these people to come into our country. I’m sorry,” he said. “This is a story that just seems to be more and more happening and it’s really not very pretty to watch.”…
International Business Times: "Muslims Fear Backlash After Brussels Attack"
Hillary Clinton: US response to Brussels jihad mass murders must be "consistent with our values"
Facebook

Monday, March 21, 2016

#Trump Dominates #HillaryClinton Speech At AIPAC: ‘Everything’s Negotiable?… Israel’s Security is Not’ !#TrumpTrain #VoteTrump @Breirbart

0

Washington, D.C. – U.S. presidential candidate and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton used her platform on the stage at the American-Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) this morning to repeatedly hit out at Republican front runner Donald Trump over his position on Israel and the Middle East peace process.

Sec. Clinton, who took to the stage almost 90 minutes after her billed time of 8am, touched on the spate of terrorist stabbings and attacks in Israel, the boycott movement, ISIS, and of course the Middle East Peace Process. But her most significant comments to the thousands-strong crowd were about Mr. Trump, who is due to speak at the event later today. And she worked the Republican candidate into almost every part of her speech.
She began: Our next president will walk into the Oval Office next January and immediately face a world with perils we must meet with strength and skill…” she added that “walking away is not an option”.
TOPSHOT - Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton waves as she arrive to speak during the 2016 AIPAC Policy Conference in Washington, DC, March 21, 2016. / AFP / Jim Watson (Photo credit should read JIM WATSON/AFP/Getty Images)
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton waves as she arrive to speak during the 2016 AIPAC Policy Conference in Washington, DC, March 21, 2016 –– AFP/Jim Watson/Getty
Mrs. Clinton was robust for most of her hour-long speech about the prospect of a Donald Trump presidency, coming back to the issue time and again, littering her comments with disparaging remarks about the Republican candidate.
She said: “Candidates for President who think the U.S. can outsource Middle East security to dictators, or that America no longer has vital national interests at stake in this region, are dangerously wrong”. The comments were a reference to Mr. Trump’s long-held viewthat had Arab strongmen like Saddam Hussein or Bashar al Assad maintained absolute control in their countries, the region would be more stable.
Sec. Clinton made passing reference to the spate of terrorist attacks in Israel, mentioning by name Taylor Force, a 28-year-old West Point graduate who had served in Iraq and Afghanistan, who was killed in a terrorist attack in Israel just two weeks ago.
She added the usual, AIPAC-style, stump statements. That Palestinians must stop funding, supporting, celebrating, and endorsing terrorism. That the Iran nuclear deal is working. And that she believes in ever closer union with Israel.
Mrs. Clinton slammed the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement, many of whose activists were lined up outside the venue – the Walter E. Washington Convention Center in downtown D.C. – many of whom have voiced support for Mrs. Clinton’s Democratic adversary 
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT)
16%
.
WASHINGTON, DC - MARCH 21: Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton address the annual policy conference of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) March 21, 2016 in Washington, DC. Presidential candidates from both parties gather in Washington to pitch their plans for Israel. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)
WASHINGTON, DC – MARCH 21: Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton address the annual policy conference of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) March 21, 2016 in Washington, DC. Presidential candidates from both parties gather in Washington to pitch their plans for Israel. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)
And speaking on anti-Semitism, she told Jewish students in the audience at AIPAC: “Don’t let anyone silence you, bully you, or shut down debate especially in places of learning like colleges and universities”.
Then, she pivoted back to Mr. Trump, noting that we have had “a glimpse of a potential U.S. foreign policy that would insult our allies, not engage them. And that would embolden our adversaries, not defeat them”.
With specific reference to the U.S.-Israel relationship she argued, “the alternative is unthinkable,” adding: “We need steady hands, not a president who says he is neutral on Monday, pro-Israel on Tuesday, and who knows what on Wednesday because ‘everything’s negotiable’!”
“Israel’s security is non negotiable,” she roared, stating that whoever does not think so “has no business being our President”.
Of the Iran nuclear deal, Sec. Clinton commented: “It is not good enough to trust and verify… our approach must be to distrust and verify” and hit out at the European Union for failing to designate Hezbollah in its entirety as a terrorist entity.
She said on ISIS: “[The] goal cannot be to contain ISIS, we must defeat ISIS,” before once again pivoting to Mr. Trump: “We cannot be neutral about Israel and Israel’s future,” she noted – a nod to Mr. Trump’s comments that he would like to be a “neutral” negotiator in any deal between the Israelis and Palestinians.
And speaking of her own shot at the Presidency, Mrs. Clinton lamented, “Of course some of us remember Golda Meir” who was the female prime minister of Israel, leading from 1969 to 1974. “So we in America are wondering, what’s taking us so long?” adding Mrs. Clinton – an allusion to the idea that she should be made president because she is a woman.
And finally, Mrs. Clinton turned to Donald Trump again, noting his positions on a temporary ban on Muslim immigration to the United States, and a preference for Syrian Christians in terms of refugees. Mrs. Clinton invoked the memory of “1000 Jews aboard the St. Louis who were refused entry in 1939 and sent back to Europe”, pulling at the heartstrings of delegates.
In fact the 908 Jewish refugees on the St. Louis were turned away from Cuba, Canada, and the United States – and almost a third of them who returned are believed to have died during the Holocaust.
“America should be better than this,” Mrs. Clinton declared, before imploring the audience to “stand up” to “a bully” without mentioning Mr. Trump by name once throughout her entire speech.
“Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim,” she said, before closing with idea that America and Israel are already great, and do not need a Trump presidency to make it happen.
AIPAC is being attended by nearly 18,000 delegates this year, making it the largest event in the organisation’s history. Mrs. Clinton speaks in Phoenix, Arizona, later today.